Nature journal has announced that it will now require transparent peer review (TPR) for all primary research articles chosen for publication. This move is aimed at increasing scientific transparency and supporting the principles of open science.

After a successful trial period, Nature's universal TPR will replace its previous opt-in system from 2020. Reviewers will remain anonymous unless they opt to reveal their identities. This initiative aligns with Springer Nature's broader dedication to research transparency and open sharing.

Magdalena Skipper, Nature's Editor-in-Chief, emphasized the importance of peer review in enhancing the quality of research papers before publication. She highlighted that the aim of peer review is to improve the paper and assist authors in refining their arguments. However, these interactions between authors and reviewers, guided by editors, are often not made public. By publishing peer review reports, Nature aims to provide valuable insights into the publication process, particularly for early-career researchers.

Deborah Sweet, Executive VP of Journals at Nature Portfolio, Springer Nature, underscored the significance of transparency in research. She stated that transparency is a key aspect of their commitment to the research community and that they are actively working to expand transparent peer review to a wider range of research journals within the Nature Portfolio. Sharing academic exchanges can lead to a better understanding of how scientific knowledge progresses, enhance trust in science, promote knowledge sharing, and support the broader objectives of open science.

Springer Nature has been implementing transparency measures in its journals since 1999, when BMC started disclosing reviewer names and pre-publication histories. Nature Communications introduced optional TPR in 2016 and made it mandatory for direct submissions in 2022. By early 2024, over a third of Springer Nature's journals will offer preprint sharing and transparent peer review through the In Review platform.