Consumer group CitizenWatch Philippines is calling on President Marcos to veto the Konektadong Pinoy Bill, which aims to establish a data transmission and connectivity framework in the country. Orlando Oxales, the lead convenor of CitizenWatch Philippines, expressed concerns about national security and regulatory gaps in the bill that could compromise the country's digital infrastructure. He highlighted the lack of safeguards against data breaches and foreign interference, which could weaken the digital security and consumer protection framework.

The Konektadong Pinoy Bill, also known as Senate Bill 2699, has been ratified by Congress and is currently under final review by Malacañang. Oxales pointed out that the bill eliminates the requirement for new telecommunications service providers to secure a congressional franchise or Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Additionally, it reduces the regulatory authority of the National Telecommunications Commission, allowing new entrants to register without proving financial, technical, or cybersecurity capability.

Oxales raised concerns about the bill's impact on Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas (GIDA), as it may incentivize new players to focus only on profitable urban markets, neglecting vulnerable internet users. He warned that allowing unvetted players, potentially foreign-controlled entities, to operate critical infrastructure without proper oversight could lead to serious security vulnerabilities and even a national crisis.

CitizenWatch, along with other stakeholders such as the Philippine Chamber of Telecommunications Operators and the Philippine Association of Private Telecommunications Companies, is alarmed by the bill's shortcomings. Key concerns include the lack of mandatory cybersecurity readiness for new players and the exemption of certain technologies from NTC authorization.

Oxales emphasized the importance of learning from past mistakes, citing the issues with Philippine offshore gaming operators that resulted in national security implications. He urged the President to veto the bill to prevent a potential security crisis and called for a revised version in the 20th Congress with stronger safeguards and a more balanced approach.

Consumer safety and national security should not be compromised in the pursuit of digital inclusion. It is crucial to ensure a beneficial outcome for all stakeholders by pushing for a bill that secures the digital future, protects consumers, and promotes a level playing field.