Democrats are currently facing internal divisions over US policy towards Iran as President Donald Trump contemplates taking action against Tehran's nuclear program. This comes after years of disagreements within the party over the Israel-Iran conflict and support for Israel. While progressives are calling for a united stance against Trump's potential actions, party leaders are advocating for a congressional role before any military intervention. The situation is further complicated by the upcoming 2028 presidential race, with many Democratic hopefuls remaining silent on the Israel-Iran war.

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., has introduced legislation urging Trump to refrain from using US armed forces against Iran without explicit authorization from Congress. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has also voiced opposition to any military intervention, criticizing Trump's alignment with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Some Democrats believe the party should take a clear anti-war stance as Trump considers military action that contradicts his previous anti-interventionist promises.

While mainstream Democrats like Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer are cautious in their approach, others are critical of Israel's strikes and Trump's role in escalating tensions with Iran. The party is facing a challenging test in bridging the gap between its activist base, which is skeptical of foreign interventions, and more traditional Democrats and independents who support US-Israel relations.

Overall, the Democratic Party is grappling with how to navigate the complex dynamics of the Israel-Iran conflict amid Trump's considerations for military action. The internal divisions within the party reflect broader debates over US foreign policy and interventionism.