President Trump is facing a critical decision regarding Iran: whether to intervene militarily by targeting the Fordo nuclear site, potentially derailing nuclear talks. The Fordo facility is buried deep beneath a mountain and can only be reached by the US military's GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, delivered exclusively by B-2 stealth bombers. Israel does not possess this capability.

A US strike would mark a significant shift for Trump, who campaigned on a platform of noninterventionism. It could end ongoing negotiations with Iran and test Trump's foreign policy approach of balancing 'America First' with a desire to appear tough on the global stage.

Iran's foreign minister has warned that the next steps taken by President Trump will have serious consequences. He suggested that a single phone call from Washington could influence Israeli actions in the region.

Tehran on Edge

The situation in Tehran is tense, with the Fordo nuclear site at the center of the conflict.

Key Statements

• Trump emphasized that he is not seeking a ceasefire but a complete resolution from Iran.
• US Senator Lindsey Graham has urged Trump to consider military action if diplomacy fails.
• Former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant believes that action must be taken against Iran.
• Iran's Araghchi has indicated a willingness to return to diplomacy if the aggression stops.
• G7 leaders have called for broader de-escalation in the region.

China has criticized Trump for escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, warning that further actions could intensify the conflict.

What Could Happen Next

Sources suggest that Tehran has sought diplomatic intervention from other countries to pressure Israel into a ceasefire. Trump has called for immediate talks between the parties involved.

The US could leverage military threats to push for a diplomatic resolution. Trump has the option to use the bunker-buster bomb if diplomacy fails, as the US holds the capability to destroy the Fordo site.

Final Thoughts

President Trump faces a critical decision on whether to engage directly in the conflict between Israel and Iran. His choice could have far-reaching implications for nuclear talks, regional stability, and the future of US foreign policy.