The swift and impactful results of Israel's surprise military campaign against Iran's nuclear program and military leadership, initiated last week, were immediately apparent. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized the importance of eliminating Iran's nuclear and missile threats. The campaign's objectives include dismantling Iran's nuclear facilities and eliminating its ballistic missile arsenal.

However, experts warn of potential challenges and risks associated with expanding military operations in Iran. There are concerns about the possibility of regime change and the destabilizing effects it could have on the region. The U.S. has not engaged in offensive attacks against Iran but has provided support to Israel in defense operations.

Efforts to neutralize Iran's nuclear program have seen some success, with damage reported at key enrichment sites. Yet, the Fordow enrichment plant remains a significant challenge due to its underground location. President Trump has expressed support for Israel's actions and emphasized the need for Iran to return to the negotiation table.

Destroying Iran's ballistic missile capabilities is another crucial goal of the campaign. The IDF has targeted Iran's missile launch vehicles and stockpiles, reducing Tehran's missile capacity. However, Iran still poses a threat to American and allied targets in the region.

The possibility of regime change in Iran remains a contentious issue. Experts caution against the uncertainties and risks associated with such a strategy. Netanyahu has encouraged the Iranian people to rise up against the government, but the population's focus may be on survival rather than revolution amidst ongoing attacks.

The situation in Iran has sparked fear and uncertainty among the population, with concerns about the impact of military operations on civilians and infrastructure. The conflict has heightened tensions in the region, with implications for stability and security.